Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140228
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '17 at 01:25
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 160
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 522
50% 413 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 31.6
30% 36 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 34.1
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.7% Above average
Read 261
Write 249
Mixed 224
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 26.4
87% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 59.4
72% 124 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS153014VLS300 147GB
105GB free
Firmware: A590
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 108
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.91
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 65%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
67GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 35.7
Mixed 34
45% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.23
40% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 22%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
15GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 34.3
Mixed 13.8
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.36
60% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 35.8
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback