HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170621
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 18:26
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 98 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 583 58% 471 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5128GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 1,145 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,304 Write 385 Mixed 607 167% 766 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 43.9 167% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 126 144% 250 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 120%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 769GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 119 100 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 61 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 47 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 421855264 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 262148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 530 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	70.4% Very good	Read 119 Write 126 Mixed 120 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.21 80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 20.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,366x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	963x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,345x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	784x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	190x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16