Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	17.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration	350 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 153 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 469 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 50 Parallax 54.1 37% 49.9 fps	MRender 49.7 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 36.5 34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin ECO2 240GB-$109 340 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 604ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 15997882 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 138366666417209 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 731 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 38 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 35 45 77312360483 (C2) HDA temperature 35 45 77312360483 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15997882 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15997882 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15997882 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 17179869185 (E9) Unknown 0 0 24508 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8832 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8832 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9593	48.7% Average	Read 294 Write 225 Mixed 155 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 9.74 73% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 43.4 35% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 499GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 5991 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5153 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22390 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4306 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 297 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5152 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3864 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.9% Average	Read 73.8 Write 96.3 Mixed 96.8 67% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.4 107% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3160815SV 160GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: 3.ACF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 78 156429011 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4936 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 305826303 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15821 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 944 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 589430818 (C2) HDA temperature 34 41 81604378658 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 80 61 62259201 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	41.2% Average	Read 71.1 Write 72.5 Mixed 69.5 54% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.43 98% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%
SABRENT 500GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 164GB free, PID 1561 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 285%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 20GB 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	208x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16