Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 05:59
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 243 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 784 77% 628 Pts	64-Core 985 61% 985 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 68.6 Parallax 61.7 56% 66.5 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 54.1 51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 22 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 225084304	110% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 424 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 46.7 171% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 103 117% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 87GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 90 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 14 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 804392076	109% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 415 Mixed 418 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 45 168% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 112 125% 211 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 130876244373424 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 365 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 359 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 109 109 23735751 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 359 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 695792 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 42 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 695792 (F2) Unknown 100 100 506725 (F9) Unknown 100 100 29802	60.6% Good	Read 371 Write 149 Mixed 218 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 14.3 105% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 54.5 67% 118 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13538 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 50 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3868820735	80.1% Excellent	Read 380 Write 307 Mixed 313 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 33.1 139% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 39 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 104 77% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 669GB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 123681960 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5977 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 46 44 6738881277653 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 350 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 131074 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 4967825443 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 409550 (C2) HDA temperature 35 49 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 44435731656758 (F1) Unknown 100 253 35597291007 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27764517216	91.7% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 164 Mixed 134 113% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.25 86% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 114%
PI-202US SATA/USB20 Drive 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 200GB free, PID 1640 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 34.8 Mixed 6.17 29% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 36.2 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 27.7 88% 31 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16