Asus CM6870

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration	381 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 176 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 449 47% 375 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8540) 3GB CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 5.19 6% 6.72 fps	MRender 8.86 Gravity 6.83 Splatting 9.96 7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 309 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 537 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 196 (64) Unknown 100 100 1227904 (65) Unknown 100 100 290944 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 49 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 181 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2786 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 100 176094904349 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 309 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 309 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2068 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1191 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1705 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2136 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 309	60.1% Good	Read 478 Write 259 Mixed 265 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 9.89 61% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 31 61% 124 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 23GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 93 28895072 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5001 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 17916576219 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12753 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4715 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6693 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 425 (BE) vendor-specific 71 50 488439837 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 574 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 15619 (C2) HDA temperature 29 50 60129542173 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 1 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 1 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21131239083549 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -64559717647603 (F2) Unknown 100 253 137492288015289	72.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 120 Mixed 116 93% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.24 60% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 112%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 331GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 34.8 Mixed 9.12 31% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.14 54% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 41%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 4 Mixed 6.24 9% 9.22 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.006 15% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GB 1,334 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	504x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16