Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3072 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 12:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 515
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 52.4
Parallax 74.1
50% 62.5 fps
MRender 57.2
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 73.9
52% 62.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 472
Mixed 491
110% 491 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 29.7
117% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 20.7
52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 965
Mixed 1,046
251% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 21.8
126% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 20.7
33% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 154%
Great: 236%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 184
Mixed 186
142% 189 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.92
4K Mixed 0.51
171% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback