Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '17 at 04:52
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 851 77% 650 Pts	64-Core 1,188 74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 1989) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Lighting 88.7 Reflection 89.4 Parallax 79 72% 85.7 fps	MRender 81.9 Gravity 80 Splatting 71 63% 77.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 512GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1066 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 443 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B2) Unknown 94 94 414 (B3) Unknown 95 95 806 (B4) Unknown 95 95 15322 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 94 94 7650 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3313407345 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2559693202	66.9% Good	Read 477 Write 378 Mixed 420 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 13 76% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 59.8 46% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 145051672 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 56 38702804783 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2972 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 658 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032844 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 17735417887 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3336 (C2) HDA temperature 31 42 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 127191161505758 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8322413190 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6513559379	90.4% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 144 Mixed 143 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.31 75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 298GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2225 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1760 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4928 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1009 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 383 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1376 (C2) HDA temperature 115 98 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77% Very good	Read 137 Write 131 Mixed 129 100% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 0.26 124% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2TB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 95.8 Write 97.2 Mixed 92.2 123% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.24 79% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 42%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 452GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 77.5 Write 91.5 Mixed 74.6 106% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.24 69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 43%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 5,796 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Read 27.8 Write 9.52 Mixed 8.64 16% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 29% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2133 2OZ 4x8GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.1% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 24.4 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23.6 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)