Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '17 at 16:41
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 178 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 342 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.1% Good	Lighting 103 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 37.2 84% 62 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 51.7 40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 84 38886696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 18 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -97083440740604 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4433 (AB) Unknown 0 0 18 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 57 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 18 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 38886696 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 18 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 38886696 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 38886696 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19449 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16367 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16367 (F2) Unknown 0 0 21084	61.6% Good	Read 464 Write 133 Mixed 184 56% 260 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 16.2 99% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 46.2 60% 107 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 82%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 15GB free Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10527 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3895 (E8) Unknown 100 100 20613077123 (E9) Unknown 98 0 98	66.1% Good	Read 267 Write 254 Mixed 257 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 29.6 102% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 98.3 97% 154 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 104%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 113GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 190 5366 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13594 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 33530 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6905 (BE) vendor-specific 48 14 52 (C2) HDA temperature 98 64 52 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.7% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 53.7 Mixed 52.6 41% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.37 100% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 21,220 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.8 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	748x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	508x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	382x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16