Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 12:16
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 839
81% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 60.5
52% 64 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 60
Splatting 54.6
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 404
Mixed 415
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 34.5
113% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 115
118% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
435GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 93.8
Mixed 87.2
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.15
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
324GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 100
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
225GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 115
Write 92
Mixed 90.9
74% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.2
95% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
111GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 93.5
Mixed 88.3
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.34
87% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
98GB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
89GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 111
Mixed 86
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2200 MHz clocked @ 2333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback