PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Default string |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170607 |
Uptime | 29.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 28 '17 at 03:36 |
Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2883) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G3A1 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 425x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 116x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 84x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 51x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 48x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $457 |