Medionpc MS-7653

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medionpc MS-7653 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7653
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100728
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '17 at 11:54
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	42% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 83 43% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 84.9 11% 83.1 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 2207) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.18% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 5.06 5% 6.13 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 8.35 6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.18% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10479 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 64 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11965728885	48.8% Average	Read 259 Write 205 Mixed 217 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 17.3 81% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 49.4 DQ Mixed 17.9 20% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 134%
Asmt 2105 1TB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 259GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 29.2 Mixed 26.1 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.02 38% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 92%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 27GB free Firmware: 3.AFE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 67 158880123 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 74 74 27039 (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 190 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 51780303668 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 34099 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3176 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 20139 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 36 -53359865298896 (C2) HDA temperature 48 64 73014444080 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 45 214795248 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.2% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 44 Mixed 43.2 33% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.34 80% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 159GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 29.2 Mixed 25.7 37% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.19 52% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 44%
Generic CF Card Reader 2GB 0GB free, PID 6365 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.33% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 16.5 Mixed 15 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.15 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 17% 1.4 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7653 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7653

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	8x
Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	1x

SSD
LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 1,579 samples	2x
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	1x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	3x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16