Gigabyte GA-X5X7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X5X7 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '17 at 07:30
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HK 18,903 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 258 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 569 49% 417 Pts	64-Core 608 38% 608 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	282% Outstanding	Read 2,916 Write 1,551 Mixed 1,848 464% 2,105 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 52.9 216% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 51.5 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 35.8 46% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 282% Great: 306%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 710GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 672 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1277 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 670 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 28038 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 231928954916 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	65.4% Good	Read 112 Write 116 Mixed 119 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.16 71% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 75%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 0062 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.76% Terrible	Read 25 Write 10.7 Mixed 14.5 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.25 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.007 28% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB 3,102 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	85% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26.9 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 62 65% 62 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X5X7 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X5X7

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	10x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	2x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	2x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples	2x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 4x16GBCrucialBench 75%, 45 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16