Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '17 at 00:35
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 159 70% 114 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 238 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6161) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Lighting 76 Reflection 78.1 Parallax 68.3 62% 74.2 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 74 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2882 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 591 (B1) Unknown 94 94 66 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 53 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8436834250	35.7% Below average	Read 228 Write 142 Mixed 35.2 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 4.46 60% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 39.4 DQ Write 24.8 DQ Mixed 16.3 16% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 108%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 250GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 155 5216 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4230 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36425 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1473 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 336963 (C2) HDA temperature 130 105 17 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.7% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 69.7 Mixed 26.3 38% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.23 79% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36 4,086 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 43GB free Firmware: V54OA7BA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (02) Throughput performance 166 100 170 (03) Spinup time 112 100 25791430994 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8321 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 100 32 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 32856 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2597 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8728 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8728 (C2) HDA temperature 253 105 244813594647 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	31.3% Below average	Read 63.4 Write 45.5 Mixed 23.5 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.25 72% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	116x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	186x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16