To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration71 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 68.8
42% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 69.8
8-Core 68.4
9% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 70.3
4% 70.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 67.5
Mixed 26.9
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback