Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus B85-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150922
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 16:07
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 257 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 666 74% 584 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3125) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 27.7 Reflection 22.1 Parallax 24.6 22% 24.8 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 28.5 20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11320 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 783 (B1) Unknown 95 95 86 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 192 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43428925332	94.5% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 409 Mixed 406 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 41.4 152% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 29.1 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 24.1 27% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 49GB free Firmware: 0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8738 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1476 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 1 (AD) Unknown 100 100 298 (AE) Unknown 100 100 457 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 993 (E8) Unknown 96 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1786 (F1) Unknown 100 100 32702570917 (F2) Unknown 100 100 30069206302	45.5% Average	Read 492 Write 274 Mixed 355 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 4.3 30% 8.97 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 4.19 5% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 56%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: ACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 159 159 17202807157 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1704 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9377 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 720 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9216 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 193274249245 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.8% Good	Read 85.8 Write 151 Mixed 87.7 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.15 84% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 201GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 141 Write 145 Mixed 82.5 153% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.15 46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	143x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	124x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	122x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	64x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	41x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	39x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	45x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16