Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Memory 11.3 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 50.9 17% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 61 8-Core 72.1 9% 66.6 Pts	64-Core 63.2 4% 63.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4627 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 2% 1.44 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	Read 168 Write 91.6 Mixed 124 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 7.16 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 4.13 22% 7.78 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 4.23 6% 9.85 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 2x1GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.06% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 1.8 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 392 10% 392 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 16%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	56x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	32x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	45x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	20x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	12x

SSD
SSDSCKKF128G8L 128GBIntelBench 55%, 138 samples	24x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	18x
RTITF128PCA1MADL 128GBBench 52%, 89 samples	10x

RAM
MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 4x1GBMicronBench 20%, 428 samples	34x
H9HCNNN8KUMLHR 4x1GBHynixBench 18%, 593 samples	25x
K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GBSamsungBench 19%, 1,067 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16