Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 05:13
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 226 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 471 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3125) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 27.7 Reflection 22.2 Parallax 24.7 22% 24.9 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 28.5 20% 24 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11311 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 780 (B1) Unknown 96 96 85 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 191 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43205813802	86.3% Excellent	Read 508 Write 388 Mixed 386 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 23 136% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 44.5 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 23 28% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 49GB free Firmware: 0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8728 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1473 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 1 (AD) Unknown 100 100 298 (AE) Unknown 100 100 454 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 993 (E8) Unknown 96 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1786 (F1) Unknown 100 100 32698128624 (F2) Unknown 100 100 30059586203	50.5% Above average	Read 499 Write 302 Mixed 329 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 6 40% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 5.82 7% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 56%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: ACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 169 169 34386018580 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1692 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9367 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 717 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9204 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9204 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 193274249245 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.4% Good	Read 89.4 Write 145 Mixed 90.5 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.16 86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 206GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 136 Write 127 Mixed 97.7 150% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.17 28% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	143x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	124x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	122x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	64x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	41x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	39x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	45x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16