Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator G3-572 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienta_KLS
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 358 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 35.8 34% 35.7 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 34.3 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 352 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 57 (64) Unknown 100 100 722597 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 94 94 73 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B2) Unknown 100 100 41 (B3) Unknown 100 100 123 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2517 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 40 0 98787852328 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 94 82 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2982 (F1) Unknown 100 100 715 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1044 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 8248	56% Above average	Read 498 Write 136 Mixed 162 58% 266 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 10.4 71% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 15.1 51% 113 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 465GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 191 1283 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1858 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 220 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 55 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 261 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3705 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	39.7% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 69.9 Mixed 58.5 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 0.37 131% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GB 4,593 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 7.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,058x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	342x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	755x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	446x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	199x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	341x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	182x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	65x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	156x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	121x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16