Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-E (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '17 at 13:48
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 116 52% 84 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 228 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Lighting 78.5 Reflection 79.3 Parallax 77.1 64% 78.3 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 74.1 60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 16215 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2098 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1715 (A8) Unknown 100 100 48 (AA) Unknown 95 95 89 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1769532 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 543 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 1764 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2102	60.4% Good	Read 218 Write 241 Mixed 231 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 10.8 100% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 16.2 61% 135 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 94GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896764087 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 603 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 699 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 518 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 603 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 603 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 184684707875 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10	71.7% Very good	Read 143 Write 106 Mixed 82.9 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 107%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 106GB free Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 55 (03) Spinup time 155 143 9241 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3896 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5221 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3441 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1894 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2001 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 74.6 Mixed 60 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.41 123% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	55x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	18x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	14x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	7x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	129x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	24x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16