Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '17 at 11:12
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 984
98% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 148
Parallax 129
111% 138 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
172GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 470
Write 327
Mixed 336
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 23.2
111% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 33.3
47% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 1,184
Mixed 1,435
361% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 28.7
206% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 208
235% 404 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 246%
Great: 236%
SanDisk SD SDDR-289 16GB
15GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 90.2
Write 41.1
Mixed 56.6
72% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.44
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 1.59
151% 3.09 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBR2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2472 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback