Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '17 at 10:30
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$100 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 156 2-Core 313 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 618 8-Core 620 83% 619 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Lighting 77.9 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 67.5 64% 74.4 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 70.3 Splatting 72.4 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 21694805 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 -117115168203773 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 909 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 103 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21694805 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21694805 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21694805 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11580 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8314 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8314 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11246	71.4% Very good	Read 498 Write 129 Mixed 190 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 17.1 127% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 47.2 66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 82%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 194 194 21496398085 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1413 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1323 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 463 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1828 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1828 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 206159675427 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.9% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 159 Mixed 145 118% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.19 87% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 937GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 168 168 17195139289 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1333 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1218 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 430 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2435 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2435 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 206159609891 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.6% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 153 Mixed 147 117% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.19 97% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 108%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 657GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 222 7316 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18233 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33814 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6866 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 777 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 18233 (C2) HDA temperature 112 96 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 90.1 Mixed 84.9 67% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.51 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x4GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 27.9 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,511x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16