Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '17 at 09:37
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 282
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 803
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 199
Parallax 177
140% 182 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 172
Splatting 124
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
83GB free
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 351
Write 138
Mixed 167
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 4.16
104% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 19.5
56% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 407
Mixed 416
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 49.7
180% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 120
144% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
12GB free
Firmware: DC81605 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 427
Mixed 444
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 39.5
146% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 102
137% 251 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 106%
Great: 101%
Galax TA1C0240A 240GB
7GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 451
Mixed 420
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 12.2
108% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 55.8
108% 213 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 103%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 130
Mixed 122
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 92.6
Mixed 82.8
69% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.46
4K Mixed 0.23
90% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback