PC Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	PC Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171013
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 18:17
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 838 83% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,133 70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 144 Parallax 119 103% 130 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 119 Splatting 101 89% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 128GB 1,868 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1111A_E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 141 (A3) Unknown 100 100 24 (A4) Unknown 100 100 5411 (A5) Unknown 100 100 7 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 70 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6214 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5912 (F5) Unknown 100 100 10822	86.8% Excellent	Read 513 Write 180 Mixed 268 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 37.6 148% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 69.1 94% 174 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 857GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 205287144 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 151720 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 78 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 67 555024414 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 174 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 60129542174 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 28789165785163 (F1) Unknown 100 253 413224612 (F2) Unknown 100 253 180594228	106% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 175 Mixed 174 136% 181 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2133C13K4 2x8GB 2,981 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 19.8 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 21.8 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: PC Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	25x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	3x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
RX 6800-XTAMD $650Bench 171%, 20,197 samples	2x

SSD
Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GBWD $55Bench 85%, 9,409 samples	4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	3x
850 Evo 2TBSamsung $275Bench 112%, 8,527 samples	3x

RAM
CMW64GX4M4D3600C18 4x16GBCorsairBench 98%, 1,970 samples	3x
CM4X8GD3000C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 669 samples	3x
CM4X8GF2666C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 79%, 1,887 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $726

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16