HP Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AA8h
Memory	4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110721
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 06:40
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8300 1,428 User benchmarks, average bench 41% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 32.9 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 20.5 17% 23.2 Pts	4-Core 25.1 8-Core 32.4 4% 28.8 Pts	64-Core 59.4 4% 59.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 1.91 2% 1.99 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 5020 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 147 (A5) Unknown 100 100 408173938457 (A6) Unknown 100 100 14 (A7) Unknown 100 100 28 (A8) Unknown 100 100 80 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 45 (AE) Unknown 100 100 125 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 47 201865035813 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4741794892032 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 20838 (EA) Unknown 100 100 38099 (F1) Unknown 253 253 15662 (F2) Unknown 253 253 22177 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	24.1% Poor	Read 184 Write 82.2 Mixed 99.2 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 5.57 32% 9.94 MB/s	DQ Read 65.9 DQ Write 44.6 DQ Mixed 13.1 21% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 108%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 82GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 171 1116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 398 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11750 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 157 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 79 79 365600 (C2) HDA temperature 120 103 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	42% Average	Read 77 Write 69.5 Mixed 43.6 47% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.18 44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 71%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 5GB free Firmware: 58.01D58 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 152 3291 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1898 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 27 27 53969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1666 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 357 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1925 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	24.5% Poor	Read 42.6 Write 42.3 Mixed 21.5 26% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.42 93% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor

CPU
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	24x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
Premier SP610 128GBAdata $49Bench 71%, 819 samples	3x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-minder(s)Bench 72%, 305 samples	3x

RAM
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples	23x
40GBUnknownBench 22%, 7,939 samples	19x
42GBUnknownBench 23%, 3,060 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $44

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16