Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRL-F
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '17 at 04:47
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 628
62% 508 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 118
Parallax 99.8
86% 108 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 105
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fusion-io ioDrive2 365GB
340GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 49% Great: 73%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 509
Write 200
Mixed 321
75% 343 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 18.4
82% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 71.1
80% 138 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
72GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 512
Write 250
Mixed 338
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 11.3
93% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 10.7
58% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 81%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
47GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 268
Write 242
Mixed 254
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 11.2
86% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 11
36% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965432-069.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $504
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback