HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560x1600x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150716
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '17 at 16:43
Run Duration	360 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31265L 67 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 128 57% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 318 30% 251 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315 482 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 102F) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.59 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.19 1% 0.65 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 0.87 1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150 5,048 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 116 143235487 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 58033598116114 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3002 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2561 (B1) Unknown 0 0 12 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 40 69 73018966056 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 143235487 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 143235487 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 143235487 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21844 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8667 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8667 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15561	62.7% Good	Read 393 Write 229 Mixed 203 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 17.8 89% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 54.5 66% 118 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 86%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 100 253 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 216 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1 (C2) HDA temperature 116 113 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	73.9% Very good	Read 122 Write 135 Mixed 123 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.29 118% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 100%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 521GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 82 82 6380 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 485 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 30196 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 291 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 63 488243227 (C2) HDA temperature 72 61 521797660 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 407515593 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 1186 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	45.3% Average	Read 83.8 Write 74.1 Mixed 68.2 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.34 79% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 354GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 10 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 73 73 8268 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1165 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 62599 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1112 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 219044642850 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 24 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 891 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1422	78.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 145 Mixed 115 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.52 120% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 327GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 113 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 73 72 8263 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4219 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 44430 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1906 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 223339348002 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 129 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 46 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4421	65.7% Good	Read 136 Write 93.4 Mixed 95.3 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.41 105% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 75%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 931GB free, PID 0600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.1% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 25.3 Mixed 25.2 34% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.39 92% 1.12 MB/s

ASMT 2115 1TB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 843GB free, PID null Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 79 Write 67 Mixed 70 91% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.16 21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 628GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 89.6 Write 76.6 Mixed 68.7 98% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.17 48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HP NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8

CPU
Xeon E3-1265L V2IntelBench 66%, 191 samples	7x
Celeron G1610TIntelBench 47%, 389 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples	2x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	6x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	2x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	2x
LMT-128M3M 128GBLiteonitBench 64%, 542 samples	1x

RAM
NOT AVAILABLE 2x8GBUNKNOWNBench 49%, 263 samples	11x
NOT AVAILABLE 1x8GBUNKNOWNBench 31%, 50 samples	2x
NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE 12GBUNKNOWNBench 35%, 7 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $31

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16