Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '17 at 08:56
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 5.6 GHz, turbo 6.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 95.9 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 210 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 577 61% 488 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 111 Parallax 94.2 84% 103 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 92.9 Splatting 95.9 77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.6.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 99140788 (05) Reallocated sector count 89 89 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20220706033685 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1179 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 371 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 49 1005025558562 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 99140788 (C4) Reallocation count 89 89 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 99140788 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 99140788 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 25769803776 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6543 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4043 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4043 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4840	45.9% Average	Read 258 Write 214 Mixed 238 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 9.34 65% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 53.3 51% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 162 6641 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2224 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8830 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1941 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 115 115 256074 (C2) HDA temperature 119 102 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 84.9 72% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.13 57% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 682GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 127 127 25789268268 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1961 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6471 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1624 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1961 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1961 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 206159282210 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 344	92.2% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 139 Mixed 154 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.12 59% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 48 MC Mixed 42.3 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	74x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	52x
Core i7-3930KIntelBench 77%, 4,060 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	8x
16G-D3-2133-M 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 39 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,012 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16