939m2 939Dual-SATA2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	939m2 939Dual-SATA2 (all builds)
Motherboard	939Dual-SATA2
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050905
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '17 at 09:53
Run Duration	337 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 117 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 13.8 2-Core 16 7% 14.9 Pts	4-Core 19.4 8-Core 17.2 2% 18.3 Pts	64-Core 23.6 2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PowerColor(148C 2237) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP1614N 160GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: TM100-30 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 82 6016 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4840 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2483477 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2772 (C2) HDA temperature 181 88 19 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3313863 (C4) Reallocation count 95 95 11 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	23.7% Poor	Read 42.9 Write 39.7 Mixed 26.3 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.25 60% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 32%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150 998 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 114 98 6816 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3207 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30628 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1613 (C2) HDA temperature 121 93 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 33810 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	8.86% Terrible	Read 15.1 Write 15.7 Mixed 15.1 12% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.17 35% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16