HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 20:11
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 189
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 505
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.7
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36.1
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.4% Very good
Read 269
Write 213
Mixed 220
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 41.1
146% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 23.5
40% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 124%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
783GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 30.3
38% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 43%
Kingston DT microDuo 8GB
7GB free, PID 16a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 5.89
Mixed 9
14% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.06
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.004
30% 2.69 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $31
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback