Biostar H61MLV3

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H61MLV3 (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140320
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '17 at 17:37
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 335 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 110F) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3035 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 28 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 64 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3957511066	55.5% Above average	Read 268 Write 212 Mixed 218 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 18.4 91% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 50 DQ Mixed 18.1 38% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 124%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 274GB free Firmware: 0302 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.2 Mixed 29.3 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.01 53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MLV3 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV3

CPU
Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples	33x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	28x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	27x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	62x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	21x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	11x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	7x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	9x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $53

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16