Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '17 at 04:58
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 72.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 938 85% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,356 84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 61.6 56% 66.2 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 54 50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 211GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,453 Write 1,352 Mixed 1,376 380% 1,727 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 38.6 176% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 53.1 82% 159 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10914 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3466 (B1) Unknown 96 96 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 54 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 611 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19387693628	79.8% Very good	Read 496 Write 342 Mixed 342 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 19.6 118% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.5 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 69.3 64% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 118%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 174 6966 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1366 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3080 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1223 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 214 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11519 (C2) HDA temperature 119 110 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	64.9% Good	Read 111 Write 115 Mixed 113 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.2 99% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 724GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 250 223 7475 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6397 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28673 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4727 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 898 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6396 (C2) HDA temperature 113 84 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 50 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.4% Above average	Read 101 Write 84.6 Mixed 90.8 69% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.51 119% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 662GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 77 68 7175 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4161 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7343 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3237 (BF) G-sense error rate 97 97 40337 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094380064 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 12 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 409 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4243	74.3% Very good	Read 116 Write 142 Mixed 120 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.39 104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 8,488 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 27 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 96.5 41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	114x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16