Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 880GM-LE FX (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '16 at 20:16
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 121 55% 89.1 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 196 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Lighting 9.77 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.3 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 16 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 8004418 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -79517024511141 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2508 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 261 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8004418 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8004418 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8004418 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9182 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8991 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8991 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15026	33.4% Below average	Read 189 Write 105 Mixed 117 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 13.6 60% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 42.3 DQ Mixed 6.81 12% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 700GB free Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 124381434 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1593 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 77 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 127057436 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8033 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 669 (B4) Unknown 100 100 508014458 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065671 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 505151517 (C2) HDA temperature 29 48 77309411357 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 24 124381434 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 77 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.4% Good	Read 110 Write 108 Mixed 103 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.51 117% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 68%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 292GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 134 131 4300 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3027 (05) Reallocated sector count 186 186 105 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18272 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1784 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 246 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3029 (C2) HDA temperature 104 85 39 (C4) Reallocation count 190 190 10 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.6% Average	Read 74.2 Write 88 Mixed 79.7 61% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.41 104% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JM1333KLN-4GK JM1333KLN-4GK 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 10.6 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

CPU
Phenom II X6 1045TAMD $165Bench 54%, 5,709 samples	2x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	2x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
520 Series 60GBIntelBench 62%, 1,135 samples	1x

RAM
BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 153 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 8,627 samples	1x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 7,217 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16