Lenovo 90df

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 90df (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SKYBAY
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171107
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 17:07
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 210 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 532 57% 452 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.64 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 108 Parallax 90.1 82% 99.7 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 93.2 Splatting 97.5 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1001 512GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3551001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3358 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 909 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 372 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 100 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 46 197569675291 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 95 100 15980298 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15035 (F1) Unknown 253 253 11695 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5916 (F9) Unknown 100 100 8472	87% Excellent	Read 490 Write 329 Mixed 361 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 18.4 124% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 15.4 77% 178 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 7.9 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90df Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Lenovo 90df

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GBSamsungBench 48%, 3,932 samples	1x
Q300 240GBToshiba $85Bench 75%, 5,005 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,709 samples	2x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	1x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCrucial $170Bench 77%, 3,887 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16