Medion Erazer P6679 MD60333

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion Erazer P6679 MD60333 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15KHN
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160914
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 01:46
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 174 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 272 37% 273 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1B0A 22CD) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7866 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 16 Parallax 16.7 18% 18.1 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 15.9 14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD00.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 407 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 246 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 89 89 214 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327697 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 906	58.5% Above average	Read 484 Write 313 Mixed 393 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 10.6 66% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 10.6 11% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032VS 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 244GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18% Very poor	Read 38 Write 37.2 Mixed 22.4 40% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB 6,821 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Erazer P6679 MD60333

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)