Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120608
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '17 at 13:05
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 92.7 1-Core 98 2-Core 195 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 391 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0112) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.25 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 35.4 22% 31.1 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 31.7 24% 28.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 128GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7460339 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 133393094302079 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3071 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 229 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7460339 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7460339 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7460339 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8116 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6002 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6002 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5387	38.3% Below average	Read 201 Write 116 Mixed 125 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 9.29 62% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 8.67 37% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 73 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169895 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6278 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30136 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2929 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6341 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6341 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 210454642719 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.9% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 155 Mixed 164 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.21 91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 63GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 90 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 67 65 10008 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7128 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 42791 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3179 (B5) Unknown 100 100 691461 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 17 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 49 219044446233 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 17 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7178	46% Average	Read 76.8 Write 83.2 Mixed 83.3 61% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.41 106% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 72%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 53GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 83 83 5960 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 7782 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 56064 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3339 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 81 54 320012307 (C2) HDA temperature 80 53 336789524 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 324109 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	52.3% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 90 Mixed 88.5 68% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.41 96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 6,893 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.9 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	114x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	98x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	41x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	20x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 24 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16