Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Stream x360 Convertible PC 11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 802B
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141022
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '17 at 12:13
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 46.6 33% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 47.5 8-Core 47.5 6% 47.5 Pts	64-Core 48.3 3% 48.3 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 802B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 1% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.11 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.6% Very poor	Read 164 Write 25.5 Mixed 62.7 18% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 6.14 4K Mixed 4.22 30% 8.05 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT41K256M16HA-125 1x2GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16