Asus 1215N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus 1215N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1215N
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 16 '17 at 07:18
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D525-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 13.6
15% 19.1 Pts
4-Core 25
8-Core 25.1
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 25.5
2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 243
Write 82.9
Mixed 17.9
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 4
49% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 15.8
23% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback