Asus M4N98TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N98TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '17 at 00:39
Run Duration423 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 94.3
50% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 273
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 31.9
21% 27.4 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 30
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507K
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 256
Write 143
Mixed 131
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 20.7
96% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 32.4
47% 86 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 87%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
25GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 59.6
Mixed 60.4
48% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.38
104% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
22GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 92.1
Mixed 79.9
72% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.4
130% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 76%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
8GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 95.4
Write 63.7
Mixed 65.6
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.34
100% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
6GB free, PID a209, Lexar 32 gig USB stick
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 3.91
Mixed 5.93
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
14% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback