Lenovo 80NR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80NR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Madrid
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '17 at 20:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 8.9
2-Core 24.6
31% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 22.8
8-Core 27.2
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 25.7
2% 25.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 390B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.75
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.13
1% 1.08 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SDW64G 63GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 167
Write 70.2
Mixed 105
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 3.89
33% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.9
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 3.4
9% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 0.4
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback