Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '17 at 01:41
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 725 70% 575 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6676) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Lighting 116 Reflection 101 Parallax 92.9 95% 103 fps	MRender 87.4 Gravity 93.8 Splatting 88.2 73% 89.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 75GB free Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 6015 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1803 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 23 (A8) Unknown 100 100 143 (A9) Unknown 100 100 285 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 42 (AE) Unknown 100 100 185 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 91 390842744867 (D4) Unknown 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 296 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 11287 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4366 (F2) Unknown 253 253 12139 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	77.5% Very good	Read 411 Write 391 Mixed 370 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 21.8 108% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 15.6 41% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 99%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 2,163 Write 239 Mixed 430 201% 944 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 19.3 116% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 60 74% 127 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 210%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 5GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5640 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1687 (B1) Unknown 97 97 30 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 207 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15816205460	87.3% Excellent	Read 506 Write 351 Mixed 351 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 24 123% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 64.7 88% 162 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 472GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 171 2408 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1021 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1896 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 671 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 105 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1761 (C2) HDA temperature 113 102 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	90.2% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 144 Mixed 146 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.31 122% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 460GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 243113648 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4307 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 57 55 322152519837 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4011 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1622 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295360522 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 57 487784477 (C2) HDA temperature 29 43 51539607581 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 22 243113648 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -41128606817570 (F1) Unknown 100 253 564899768 (F2) Unknown 100 253 788464210	52% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 90 Mixed 78.7 65% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.36 89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 30.5 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 24.1 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)