Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '17 at 21:36
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 238 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 860 78% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,213 75% 1,213 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 183 Parallax 188 124% 174 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 170 Splatting 123 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 233 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 120 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2076739359	73.2% Very good	Read 517 Write 409 Mixed 424 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 20.6 86% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 14.8 18% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 135%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 216GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5083 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3504 (B1) Unknown 98 98 68 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 48 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 878 (F1) Unknown 99 99 35233878175	88.3% Excellent	Read 513 Write 492 Mixed 505 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 21.5 79% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 14.6 91% 208 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 199557376 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2799 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 3097462 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3504 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1910 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 85900656661 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 41 159334531097 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 104 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6631 (C2) HDA temperature 25 59 73014444057 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 49344879270594 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5319353853 (F2) Unknown 100 253 32549981652	84.4% Excellent	Read 138 Write 155 Mixed 125 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.58 179% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 23.8 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	522x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	256x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	282x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	154x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $912

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16