Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160518
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '17 at 16:05
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 138 56% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 208 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.5% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 3.47 4% 4.32 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82 4,735 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7984 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3291 (AB) Unknown 100 100 39793744 (AE) Unknown 100 100 402 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 704 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 77 77 77 (F1) Unknown 100 100 29208 (F2) Unknown 100 100 34490 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1091576891	68.5% Good	Read 438 Write 383 Mixed 400 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 13.1 89% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 13.2 19% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 851GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 125259948 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 66 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1323477 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 102 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 67 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 74 404160536 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 67 (C2) HDA temperature 24 13 55834574872 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 1 125259948 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17257178595429 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1788816482 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1097534365	84.6% Excellent	Read 141 Write 154 Mixed 125 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.28 100% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 113%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 771GB free Firmware: JP4OA3CF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25790710074 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5653 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30511 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5522 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9682 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9682 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 236223725594 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	43% Average	Read 79.7 Write 70.1 Mixed 67.9 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.36 83% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 74%
Asmt 2115 1TB 1,671 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 533GB free Firmware: 0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 83.6 Write 79.6 Mixed 73.6 59% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.36 91% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2x4GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 15.7 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3P Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	7x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
APS-SL3N-120 120GBBench 65%, 1,034 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	5x
M2F4G64CC88D7 2x4GBNanyaBench 31%, 50 samples	4x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 26%, 256 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16