Vizio CN15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVizio CN15  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta VZ4
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 437
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Quanta(152D 0923) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.06
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.83
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disk drive 320GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 80.8
Write 72.1
Mixed 78.2
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.36
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback