Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 06:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 899
80% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 104
Reflection 164
Parallax 166
84% 144 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 162
Splatting 117
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
418GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 490
Write 328
Mixed 342
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 9.88
86% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 9.54
60% 141 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 108%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 270
Mixed 497
153% 709 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 9.76
102% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 8.21
12% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 155%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
111GB free
Firmware: 0101
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 412
Write 342
Mixed 347
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 16.9
60% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 45.6
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 19
20% 34 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 27.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 9.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback