Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '17 at 16:12
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 883 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,212 75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.43 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.9% Average	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 127 Parallax 31.1 27% 63.7 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 129 82% 98 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 231GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9629 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1516 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15783126198	102% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 411 Mixed 420 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 43.2 154% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 88.9 96% 163 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 200GB free Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22681 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3350 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 97 (AE) Unknown 100 100 138 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1687929356571 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 86 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 34 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	64% Good	Read 490 Write 267 Mixed 340 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 5.75 83% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 6.05 34% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 74%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6942 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1082 (B1) Unknown 97 97 180 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 53548237310	98.5% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 416 Mixed 464 104% 466 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 37.8 140% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 99.7 104% 172 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 124%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 81GB free Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18912 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2823 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 139 (AE) Unknown 100 100 151 (B5) Unknown 100 100 28209462907556 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 100 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1690 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	63% Good	Read 492 Write 249 Mixed 332 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 5.78 84% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 6 33% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 7.5TB free Firmware: D781 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 193 Write 77.3 Mixed 101 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.99 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.19 107% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 92%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 867GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 176 5800 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4901 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9562 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1701 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 685522 (C2) HDA temperature 122 103 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.5% Good	Read 102 Write 130 Mixed 110 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.24 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 586GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 175 5858 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3694 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5218 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 924 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 50 50 451637 (C2) HDA temperature 118 106 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.2% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 104 Mixed 87.2 71% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 23.6 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)