ADD TO PC
BUILD

Http://www.abit.com.tw/ KN9(NF-MCP55 series)

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Http://www.abit.com.tw/ KN9(NF-MCP55 series) (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '17 at 14:21
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 44.3 2-Core 86.5 41% 64.6 Pts	4-Core 89.4 8-Core 88.7 12% 89.1 Pts	64-Core 89.4 6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E152) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 5.12 5% 6.35 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 8.26 6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: X413 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 234 Write 139 Mixed 155 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 12.3 65% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 13 17% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 101%
Samsung SP0812N 80GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 57GB free Firmware: TK100-30 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 1 4096 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9315 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2961824 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4311 (C2) HDA temperature 133 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 28061 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	27.1% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 50.8 Mixed 43.2 34% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.29 73% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback