Sony VPCZ116GK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCZ116GK  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 22:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 107
47% 77 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 156
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 905A) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8880
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.71 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 131
Write 64.2
Mixed 127
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 9.46
41% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 14.7
16% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback