Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '17 at 20:14
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 79.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 958 85% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,329 82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3415) CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 74.3 51% 68.1 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 60 Splatting 54.3 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 134GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 247 100 247 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2251 (A6) Unknown 100 100 243 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 320 (A9) Unknown 100 100 26 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 282 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1252 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 100 201863462940 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 9 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 61493 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1990 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2231	77.9% Very good	Read 508 Write 370 Mixed 419 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 4.23 94% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 26.9 71% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 86%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 2,896 Write 1,209 Mixed 1,318 395% 1,808 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 35.1 193% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 25.9 74% 159 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 236%
Patriot Blast 480GB 1,476 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 52GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6781 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1941 (A8) Unknown 100 100 209 (AA) Unknown 100 100 384 (AD) Unknown 100 100 589848 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1054 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 205 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5846	76.2% Very good	Read 517 Write 357 Mixed 358 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 9.97 87% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 47.1 79% 155 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 162 6783 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 576 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4955 (C2) HDA temperature 127 119 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	92.2% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 164 Mixed 153 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.3 115% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 149 8916 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4037 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 26084 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1022 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 476 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 122 122 236005 (C2) HDA temperature 126 91 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 97.9 Mixed 88.5 73% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.38 108% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.1 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 34 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 28.7 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)