| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5QPL-VM EPU (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100601 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 12 '17 at 11:09 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.3%
Average
|
38% 53.8 Pts
|
16% 117 Pts
|
7% 118 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
|
15%
Very poor
|
15% 18.6 fps
|
16% 19.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
43.5%
Average
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
85% 30.2 MB/s
|
23% 42.8 MB/s
|
|
|
62.9%
Good
|
61% 84 MB/s
|
109% 0.81 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
19%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
42% 94.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QPL-VM EPU Builds (Compare 18 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-VM EPU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 2x |
| GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $87 |