| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H81M-H (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150810 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 12 '17 at 04:09 |
| Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71%
Very good
|
78% 132 Pts
|
38% 284 Pts
|
18% 286 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
|
29%
Poor
|
29% 31.5 fps
|
28% 35.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
95% 129 MB/s
|
102% 0.94 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
35.3%
Below average
|
32% 11 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
65% 61.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,361 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $112
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 206x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 203x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 105x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 252x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 143x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $290 |